I always like the Technorati “State” Reports but they always provoke more questions than answers about this beloved, perhaps dys-functional and upside down media we use. I read over the Why and How and Where and How Much posts with some interest. But I have more basic questions than the big ones. The why question I have is more basic than:
Why have blogs become a significant part of the media landscape so
quickly? Just what is it that makes the medium of blogging so
compelling? What are bloggers blogging about and why?
From Day 2: The What and Why of Blogging
No, I understand the Big Why questions and why they’re important. But the why question I have both transcends and is more basic. Why blog at all? What is it that draws people to the blog as a media of discovery, definition, deliberation, and perhaps even creation? I think we are all anthropologists of a sort on a mission of discovery and we perhaps do the blogging as Technorati says to present personal and professional ideologies. But why? I think its just as personal as though Mojave Desert prehistoric bloggers so long ago told us mysterious bits and pieces.
Imagine a blog-ologist digging up the remains of the blogosphere some years ahead. She turns to her robotic companion and begins the archeological meandering that makes up so much science.
This blogosphere was rich and textured. It seems to take into account a wide tapestry of human behavior, condition, and social life. People did this and did this often. This sphere of the blog was rich but yet people hammered each other at times and the media loved and hated it. We don’t have enough material culture; but was this sphere of the blog truly full of the same kind of human or did a wide swatch of humans do this blogging? Are there so-called socio-economic indicators of power, wealth at work? What is this whole authority thing and how did it cause stress and evolution of this sphere? Did the sphere ever look fractured or at stress because its social evolution could not keep up with its technical? Was there ever anomie at work?
Soon this future blog-ologist would put down the word-based trowel and rest. I bet if there were one blog she would read with relish and desire and wanting more; it would be Doc’s. I sure would want Doc’s blog encapsulated so I could read his journey. There is wheat and there is chaff. Blogs come and go. People update or not. The deeper why questions remain. But the blog-ologist would want to know. What were those social, economic, technological, and personal things? What caused the sphere to fragment and join again and get more complex? Is it the answers that Technorati presents or are the questions deeper and the report, while it provides a wealth of statistical, personal, and other information, cannot really reach the fabric.
Who knows?


