This is the final part of things and I’m fast approaching a decision point on what I will use. Basically, the two finalists are:
Both of these are only for my geeked out Getting Things Done trials and tests. I’m still maintaining a set of personal wiki pages on another tool which works very well for my purposes these days.
When I am a habilis
I am Mike the tool-user, hear my roar! So, comparing the two tools above is like apples versus oranges. Bonsai provides a very clean conduit for its palm component and you can setup outlines, multiple mindmaps of categories, keywords, next actions, planning, somedays, perhaps things. It all resides in a central XML-based file format that then syncs to a palm application that runs on my Treo 600 and is remarkable in and of itself. If all I wanted, and perhaps I will want this, is a single laptop and Treo/Palm solution, this would be the one. However, I don’t operate that way here. The ideal way is to have a tool which will allow uses across a small network and over a VPN connection. So from a basic perspective, Bonsai is great but there are some issues with sharing the work file I’ve created. But perhaps in the end, I will only want a single source that is shared on a palm device. We’ll see. The second thing that Bonsai excels at is mind-mapping. Measuring, mapping, mental geometry. But since it is an outlining tool primarily, it has a set of limitations or has not been developed to extend itself in depth. Lets take an example perhaps…
Lets say I have a call I want to do and record the information from the call in a document or set of notes that I can find easily later on. The call produces a set of Next Actions which I could merely outline as actions or contexts; but what I really want is a way to create something new as a container to hold notes, bullets, factoids. How to do that? I have to link to a document perhaps in clear text or another application that I go off and create. The notepad ability in Bonsai is limited to a few 32k or so of lenth. Not terribly good for a manager that wants to over record. But… I could live with it as long as I can build sets of outlines and depths that work. So Bonsai has a set of plusses and minuses around collaboration and depth.
If I apply the same criteria to my other application, Note Studio; it becomes much easier. I can develop pages which allow effortless linking using WikiWords and then cross-link, backlink, go crazy! It also has a palm component; but as I mentioned when I started this whole thing out, it also does a palm sync. Very nice! Its not an outliner though. It builds collaborative pages and you can share the pages between systems and users easily.
What I think I get to with the second solution is not a real Getting Things Done thing. Its more of a Geeky Getting Things Done which uses collaboration approaches within the classic approach but extends them in many directions. It makes the habilis in me want more. But, its uncomfortable to use more than one tool for a thing like this. I want “the tool” and I want the tool on my Treo as well. I’ve come to the conclusion that I don’t want or need the constant beeping of an appointment missed because I cannot operate that way. My brain does not respond well to Outlook reminders or chirping. I need a fuller and more balanced environment and I won’t miss things.
So, now I have used a set of templates that a person built for Note Studio and I’ve implemented my own GTD approach which carries forward a few ideas but also makes things work better for me with sets of definable Next Actions, Contexts of things, Someday wanna be things. Its time to really become a habilis and go test. Life is sure to get more complex soon and I want to be ready. In the mantra of GTD, I need to sit down and compile and list and act… Find all the things and have sufficient time to go through them. I’ve spent a few days here and there doing that